The impact of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio on clinical outcomes in heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Inflammation has been suggested to play a role in heart failure (HF) pathogenesis. However, the role of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), as a novel biomarker, to assess HF prognosis needs to be investigated. We sought to evaluate the impact of PLR on HF clinical outcomes. METHODS: English-published records in PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and Web-of-science databases were screened until December 2023. Relevant articles evaluated PLR with clinical outcomes (including mortality, rehospitalization, HF worsening, and HF detection) were recruited, with PLR difference analysis based on death/survival status in total and HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients. RESULTS: In total, 21 articles (n = 13,924) were selected. The total mean age was 70.36 ± 12.88 years (males: 61.72%). Mean PLR was 165.54 [95% confidence interval (CI): 154.69-176.38]. In total, 18 articles (n = 10,084) reported mortality [either follow-up (PLR: 162.55, 95% CI: 149.35-175.75) or in-hospital (PLR: 192.83, 95% CI: 150.06-235.61) death rate] and the mean PLR was 166.68 (95% CI: 154.87-178.50). Further analysis revealed PLR was significantly lower in survived HF patients rather than deceased group (152.34, 95% CI: 134.01-170.68 versus 194.73, 95% CI: 175.60-213.85, standard mean difference: -0.592, 95% CI: -0.857 to -0.326, p < 0.001). A similar trend was observed for HFrEF patients. PLR failed to show any association with mortality risk (hazard ratio: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.99-1.05, p = 0.289). Analysis of other aforementioned outcomes was not possible due to the presence of few studies of interest. CONCLUSION: PLR should be used with caution for prognosis assessment in HF sufferers and other studies are necessary to explore the exact association.

Platelet to lymphocyte ratio and heart failureInflammation plays a role in heart failure (HF), and a blood test called the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) might be helpful in predicting patients' outcomes. We found that deceased HF patients had higher PLR values in comparison to those who survived, irrespective of cardiac pump function, with similar pattern for patients with decreased cardiac function (HF with reduced ejection fraction). However, this biomarker failed to show any significant association with death risk. In conclusion, PLR may have some potential to help predict HF prognosis, but it needs more research and physicians should probably be cautious about using PLR alone in clinical settings.

Effects of cardiac rehabilitation on inflammatory biomarkers in unstable ischemic heart disease patients following percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled study.

INTRODUCTION: Several blood inflammatory markers, such as high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), are linked to increased risk for cardiovascular diseases. This study aimed to evaluate these inflammatory markers after cardiac rehabilitation (CR) in patients with unstable ischemic heart disease (UIHD) who underwent successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: A cohort of 115 patients with successful PCI due to UIHD enrolled in the study from January 2018 to March 2021. We used a permuted block stratified randomization technique (2 : 1 ratio). Seventy-seven patients were randomized to the CR group and 38 patients to the control group. The CR group underwent a 12-week pre-specified CR regimen. Blood samples were taken at baseline and follow-up at 12 weeks for both groups. RESULT: Among the 115 patients, 33 patients were female. The mean age was (53 ±â€…5.55 years) in the control and (53 ±â€…6.09 years) in the CR group. The two groups were comparable regarding their baseline characteristics and the values of the inflammatory markers. By contrast, at 12 weeks, the inflammatory marker values were significantly lower in the CR group compared to the control group; hs-CRP: 0.11 [0.08-0.14] vs. 0.21 [0.19-0.21], P -value <0.001; NLR: 2.17 [1.42-2.43] vs. 2.26 [2.07-2.6], P -value: 0.016; PLR: 91.2821 [63.3333-103.2000] vs. 92.600 [84.6154-110.0000], P -value: 0.027. CONCLUSION: CR after PCI in UIHD patients may attenuate some inflammatory markers, which might benefit cardiovascular health. Further studies are required to evaluate these findings with longer follow-up and the powered to measure major cardiovascular event rates.

Chemopreventive and therapeutic potential of curcumin in esophageal cancer: Current and future status.

Esophageal cancer is a common malignant tumor with an increasing trend during the past three decades. Currently, esophagectomy, often in combination with neoadjuvant chemo- and radiotherapy, is the cornerstone of curative treatment for esophageal cancer. However, esophagostomy is related to significant risks of perioperative mortality and morbidity, as well as lengthy recovery. Moreover, the adjuvant therapies including chemotherapy and radiotherapy are associated with numerous side effects, limiting compliance and outcome. The dietary agent curcumin has been extensively studied over the past few decades and is known to have many biological activities especially in regard to the prevention and potential treatment of cancer. This review summarizes the chemo-preventive and chemotherapeutic potential of curcumin in esophageal cancer in both preclinical and clinical settings.

Evaluation of cognitive rehabilitation on the cognitive performance in multiple sclerosis: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis (MS) can involve cognitive entities, including memory, attention, performance, and information processing. Furthermore, MS causes depression and negatively affects the quality of life (QOL). This study was aimed to assess the efficacy of cognitive rehabilitation on cognitive entities of MS patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a clinical trial study conducted on 56 MS patients in 2016-2017. Patients were randomly divided into two Groups of A (cognitive rehabilitation) and B (control group). Patients were evaluated in terms of memory, attention, QOL, and depression. Questionnaires included Abbreviated Mental Test, Prospective and Retrospective Memory Questionnaire, Everyday Memory Questionnaire, Digit Spam test for attention assessment, QOL-54 questionnaire, and Second version of Beck questionnaire assessing depression. They were filled through an interview before the study initiation, and then, the intervention group underwent ten sessions of cognitive rehabilitation and questionnaires refilled within 3 months after study initiation. Outcomes of the two groups were compared. RESULTS: Memory, attention, QOL, and depression improved significantly following the intervention in cases (P < 0.05), while no significant change was observed among controls (P > 0.05). Comparison of cases and controls in the second evaluation showed a significant difference between cases and controls (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Ten sessions of cognitive rehabilitation could significantly improve MS patients' cognitive performance. Moreover, this approach affected their QOL and sense of depression in a decisive trend. It can be concluded that cognitive rehabilitation can successfully affect numerous aspects of MS patients, while numerous medical therapies may be required for treatment of each mere aspect. Further evaluations are strongly recommended.